bug in cal (1) - actually feature

[Bob Devine]

In article <2265 at jade.BERKELEY.EDU>, oster at lapis.berkeley.edu (David Phillip Oster) writes:
> By the way,
> it is an interesting question what cal should do if you ask for a year
> before 1752. Different calendars were adopted in different places at
> different times. 
> 
> Anybody have any good references for early calendars?

  Now that mod.sources has started to spout forth articles again,
you can check for my submission that deals with early calendars
from different countries.

Bob Devine