Make(1) does not support file inclusion +Fix
Gary Winiger
gww at beatnix.UUCP
Sun Apr 3 09:54:18 AEST 1988
In article <539 at hscfvax.harvard.edu> mohamed at hscfvax.harvard.edu (Mohamed_el_Lozy) writes:
>The two postings about make seem to have something missing. Applying
>the first patch will produce a program that fails to link, with
>do_include() missing. If -DINCLUDE is removed from the DFLAGS it will
>make properly. I very much suspect that do_include() should live in
>files.c, and there are no patches for that file.
Sorry for the length of time it has taken me to reply, I'm only at Elxsi
occassionally at present.
I don't believe that the routine ``do_include'' was missing from the posting.
``do_include'' is in gram.y. Perhaps Mr. Mohamed_el_Lozy didn't either
clean the make directory before building with -DINCLUDE defined, or didn't
remove gram.c. Note that make's Makefile does not have very good dependences.
Gary..
More information about the Comp.bugs.4bsd.ucb-fixes
mailing list