s/A*./B/g editor bug?

Guy Harris guy at auspex.auspex.com
Fri Oct 20 03:24:59 AEST 1989


>Both also behave this way on SunOS 3.5, which is a 4.2 BSD derivative.
>Anyone care to try it out on a 2bsd or a V7 system?

"vi", but not "ed", behaves that way on SunOS 4.0, whose "vi" is
4.3BSD-derived and whose "ed" is S5R3-derived.



More information about the Comp.bugs.4bsd.ucb-fixes mailing list