rwhod protocol and >42 users

Dave Smith dave at fps.com
Wed Oct 4 10:01:47 AEST 1989


Has there been any thought given to extending the rwhod protocol so that
more than 42 (1024/sizeof whoent (==24)) users on a system will be reported 
correctly?  This limit is entirely too small for today's systems.

If I read the sources to rwhod correctly, if I define a new revision of the
protocol, rwhod's with different versions of the protocol will discard
the packets.  Is this correct?  Will anyone have a fit (ok, I know _someone_
will have a fit, will anyone _important_ have a fit?) if I arbitrarily
define a new revision of the protocol?

David L. Smith
FPS Computing, San Diego
ucsd!celerity!dave or dave at fps.com
"Repent, Harlequin!," said the TickTock Man



More information about the Comp.bugs.4bsd.ucb-fixes mailing list