vi(1) bug - defunct processes

[Peter da Silva]

In article <40648 at sgi.SGI.COM>, vjs at rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com (Vernon Schryver) writes:
> In article <14562 at bfmny0.UUCP>, tneff at bfmny0.UUCP (Tom Neff) writes:
> > To heck with mailx(1), this is worse.

> Ha!  Nothing is worse than mailx(1), ...

Sure. The version of mailx(1) that comes with the System-3 based Xenixes
for Intel's 310/320 boxes. It's way worse.

And then there's /bin/mail...
-- 
Peter da Silva, *NIX support guy @ Ferranti International Controls Corporation.
Biz: peter at ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180. Fun: peter at sugar.hackercorp.com. `-_-'
"Optimization is not some mystical state of grace, it is an intricate act   U
   of human labor which carries real costs and real risks." -- Tom Neff