Nasty bug in release 4 Bourne shell
Andy Crump
andyc at bucky.intel.com
Sat Jan 5 03:02:57 AEST 1991
>>>>> On 2 Jan 91 10:08:41 GMT, tneff at bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff) said:
Tom> In article <ANDYC.91Jan2085324 at bucky.intel.com> andyc at bucky.intel.com (Andy Crump) writes:
>The bug exists in AT&T's latest version of SVR4. The problem has been
>submitted to them to be fixed.
Tom> Andy, does "AT&T's latest version" in the above quote mean Version 2.0?
Tom> Or something later still, aka the "production release" we're awaiting?
This "latest version" referred to is post version 2.0 and not in
production yet.
Tom> In other words, is this Bourne bug confined to the developer releases or
Tom> will there have to be a *second* production release before it's fixed?
Maybe, it depends whether it gets fixed before USL lets it go. It has
been reported to them. That is all the info I have right now.
--
-- Andy Crump
...!tektronix!reed!littlei!andyc | andyc at littlei.intel.com
...!uunet!littlei!andyc | andyc at littlei.uu.net
Disclaimer: Any opinions expressed here are my own and
not representive of Intel Corportation.
More information about the Comp.bugs.sys5
mailing list