unary +

[Gregory Smith]

In article <951 at dataioDataio.UUCP> bright at dataio.UUCP (Walter Bright writes:
>In article <687 at bentley.UUCP> kwh at bentley.UUCP (KW Heuer) writes:
>>[3]  Someone proposed using "a+(volatile)(b+c)".  I think this is workable,
>... I'm totally against such overloading of
>the meaning of 'volatile'. It makes about as much intuitive sense as:
>	"a+(while)(b+c)"
>which is also easily implementable, but very confusing.

How about "a+(do)(b+c)", or "a+(!break)(b+c)" ? ? ? :-) (-: :-) (-:
-- 
"If you aren't making any mistakes, you aren't doing anything".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Smith     University of Toronto      UUCP: ..utzoo!utcsri!greg