C struct definition according to K & R.

[perry at vu-vlsi.UUCP]

In article <9929 at sri-spam.istc.sri.com>
 robert at sri-spam.istc.sri.com (Robert Allen) writes:
> ..
>    In short, I believe that K&R were saying, "while constructs
>    such as this (above) may cause problems in some languages, they don't in
>    C."

   I agree with that, and so does our compiler (Pyramid 90x OSx3.1) after
adding some semicolons after the struct's { }

	    struct s1 {
		int i;
		long l;
	    };

	    struct s2 {
		long i;
		int l;
	    };

>     on the net, please include the # of years you've been using C, and which
>     machines/compilers you use.  Thanks!

  I've been using C for 0.000000E+00 years, no machines or compilers, I
just compile and execute it by inspection.

...Rick			..{cbmvax,pyrnj,bpa}!vu-vlsi!perry
			perry at vuvaxcom.bitnet