Portability across architectures..
David Collier-Brown
daveb at geac.UUCP
Thu Sep 15 01:07:34 AEST 1988
In article <103 at simsdevl.UUCP> dandc at simsdevl.UUCP (Dan DeClerck) writes:
| I've run across a need to have data files in various forms of UN*X
| be portable to each other.
| I could write data out to files in ASCII, but this is cumbersome,
| slow and may hamper the products' marketability.
>From article <7038 at bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU>, by scs at athena.mit.edu (Steve Summit):
| Please strongly consider using ASCII after all. The advantages
| are many; the disadvantages are comparatively minor.
In fact, you can get better efficency in many cases by writing in
ascii: zeros and blanks are represented by single characters instead
of whole records...
Once upon a time, I used to beam with pleasure when watching a
spreadsheet stored in ascii load faster than the same thing written
in binary by a compeditor's product. It didn't happen all the time,
but it wasn't all that rare (many spreadsheets in those days were
sparse arrays, written to disk in an inefficent manner).
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown. | yunexus!lethe!dave
78 Hillcrest Ave,. | He's so smart he's dumb.
Willowdale, Ontario. | --Joyce C-B
More information about the Comp.lang.c
mailing list