C compilers with integrated preprocessors

[jim nutt]

 > From: seanf at sco.COM (Sean Fagan)
 > Organization: The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.
 > Message-ID: <1292 at scolex>

 > In article <3999 at bsu-cs.UUCP> dhesi at bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) writes:
 > >It is agreed that a Real ANSI-conforming C compiler might not supply a
 > >separate preprocessor pass, but who cares?  Such a C compiler would be
 > >an instant commercial failure.
 > 
 > I'm sure Microsoft will be sorry to hear that MSC 4.x and upwards (at 
 > least)
 > and QuickC are doomed to be "an instant commercial failure."  (True, 
 > they're
 > not strictly conforming, yet, but they're trying to get there.)

not to mention nearly every other ms-dos c compiler.  a few have separate preprocessor passes (or supply a separate preprocessor [turbo c]), but most do not.

jim nutt
'the computer handyman'


--  
St. Joseph's Hospital/Medical Center - Usenet <=> FidoNet Gateway
Uucp: ...{gatech,ames,rutgers}!ncar!noao!asuvax!stjhmc!15.11!jim.nutt