ranlib

Karl Heuer karl at haddock.ima.isc.com
Sat Aug 5 02:07:10 AEST 1989


In article <867 at dtscp1.UUCP> scott at dtscp1.UUCP (Scott Barman) writes:
>lorder(1) exists under bsd but is really not necessary with ranlib.

Conversely, ranlib is not really necessary if you have lorder and tsort.
(If tsort reports a circular dependency, the solution is to merge the objects
in question into a single module, either with `ld -r' or by recompiling them
as a single source.)

Karl W. Z. Heuer (ima!haddock!karl or karl at haddock.isc.com), The Walking Lint
Followups to comp.unix.questions only; this isn't a C issue.



More information about the Comp.lang.c mailing list