Turbo C 2.0 vs MSC 5.1

[cliff click]

In article <14015 at haddock.ima.isc.com>, suitti at haddock.ima.isc.com (Stephen Uitti) writes:
> MSC 5.0 has
> infinite bugs, is slow to compile, has a horribly complicated
> command line interface, [...]
> I'm told that MSC 5.1 is better than 5.0 - that it doesn't die
> when compiling stuff, and that it produces correct code more
> often.  

True; don't use 5.0, get 5.1.  It does produce better code than TC 2.0,
just alot more slowly.  

I use TC 2.0 for all my development, and MSC 5.1 for the final release code.

-- 
Cliff Click, Software Contractor at Large
Business: uunet.uu.net!ficc!cliff, cliff at ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5368 (w).
Disclaimer: lost in the vortices of nilspace...       +1 713 568 3460 (h).