Re^2: Question on const applied to typedef'd pointer

Doug Gwyn gwyn at smoke.BRL.MIL
Wed Mar 1 15:27:26 AEST 1989


In article <2105 at solo11.cs.vu.nl> maart at cs.vu.nl (Maarten Litmaath) writes:
>Why? I find this illogical. Else how could one obtain what Arthur intended?

It's quite logical, and one cannot do exactly what ADO was trying to do,
although there are other ways to accomplish it.  That's been explained
in a separate posting; if you still have questions ask me off-line.



More information about the Comp.lang.c mailing list