precedence of ?:

[Doug Gwyn]

In article <1265 at gmdzi.UUCP> wittig at gmdzi.UUCP (Georg Wittig) writes:
-How should
-	0 ? 0 : i = 0
-be interpreted?
-1)	as	(0) ? (0) : (i=0)
-	resulting in a (strange but) legal expression
-or 2)	as	(0 ? 0 : i) = 0
-	resulting in a syntax error

The latter is the correct parse.  See the table on p. 49 of K&R I.
As you note, it is an unwell-formed formula.

-Existing compilers don't agree on which alternative is the correct one.

Well, they ought to.  See the table on p. 49 of K&R I.