Parameter mismatch legality question

[Tim Olson]

In article <14486 at smoke.brl.mil> gwyn at smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes:
| In article <1990Nov15.224353.155 at mozart.amd.com> tim at proton.amd.com (Tim Olson) writes:
| >		foo(a);
| >	foo(a, b, c, d)
| >	c) Illegal

I like that answer, but what about, say the UNIX "open" library call,
which has the optional "mode" parameter used this way...


--
	-- Tim Olson
	Advanced Micro Devices
	(tim at amd.com)