Microsoft C 6.0 on a PC-NFS client

Tom West west at turing.toronto.edu
Tue Nov 13 10:00:32 AEST 1990


In article <1990Nov12.203707.9669 at maverick.ksu.ksu.edu> kxb at hilbert.math.ksu.edu (Karl Buck) writes:
>We are having trouble getting MSC 6.0 to recognize the include files on a
>network drive. The environment variables all seem to be set up right and the
>proper permissions are on the directories and files. Since I'm sure this
>is a simple problem I'd apprectiate any answers by Email. Thanks.

  Good luck, MSC 6.0 requires every spare bit that you can round up.  Having
PC-NFS up will eat way more memory than MSC 6.0 is willing to accept.  We
eventually had to give up the idea of using our SUNs to store source to
our program, a real pain.  And no, MSC 6.0 does *not* use extended memory
when compiling, so your extra 2 meg sit by idle while it complains about
noit enough memory.  And yes, MSC 6.0 is filled with bugs.  And yes, the
update doesn't come with a change history, so it is next to useless unless
you have the time to go through each of the code generation bugs you've
found by yourself *since MS doesn't give out bug lists* and check the assembler
output yourself.  And yes, MS does charge an arm and a leg for such a compiler.

  On the other hand, CV 3.0 is pretty nifty, aside from the fact that you can't
feed your programs Ctrl-Breaks.  (CV steals them all.)  However, CV DOES
use the extended memory you might have (yeah!).

				Tom West



More information about the Comp.lang.c mailing list