&&**

[Tim Roberts]

In article <20757:Sep1115:30:0390 at kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd at kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:
>In article <0926 at sheol.UUCP> throopw at sheol.UUCP (Wayne Throop) writes:
>  [ that if a compiler reduces &&**x to x then it is buggy ]
>
>Question for the standards people: Is && undefined, unspecified,
>implementation-defined, or what have you?

Of course && is defined!  It's the logical "AND" operator!      :-)

And now, back to our regularly scheduled debate.