stdarg

Doug Gwyn gwyn at smoke.brl.mil
Thu Feb 7 06:53:07 AEST 1991


In article <1991Feb6.171144.7182 at Neon.Stanford.EDU> dkeisen at Gang-of-Four.Stanford.EDU (Dave Eisen) writes:
>Probably a reasonable decision. But it does make it a pain to deal
>with the third party software we use that is full of <varargs.h> functions
>that can take 0 or more arguments.

Since the linkage for <stdarg.h> is not necessarily the same as that
which was used for <varargs.h>, you have to go through the code and
fix it anyway.  Adding a dummy argument to those functions should
not be much more work than you already have to do.



More information about the Comp.lang.c mailing list