LL(1) C grammar

[Dave Jones]

>From article <91-06-021 at comp.compilers>, by jos at and.nl (J. Horsmeier):
> ... brew LL(1) parser generator ...
> ... For several reasons (interpretation
> versus compilation, incremental parser building etc.), we do not want to use
> lex/yacc.


Huh? There's nothing that can be done with an LL parser
that can't be done with an LR parser. What do you mean by "interpretation
versus compilation, incremental parser building etc"?