Uses for process.h on IBMs under DOS?

[Mark William Hopkins]

In article <1991Mar18.181605.14265 at bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu> consp06 at bingsuns.cc.binghamton.edu (Robert Konigsberg) writes:
>I know that DOS is not really a multiprocessing machine, so with that in
>mind, what uses could I have for process.h, and associated stuff?

Future compatibility with the envisioned multiprocessing 386/486-based
operating systems sounds like the most likely reason.

There are multiprocessing DOS's out there too, like Double DOS...