Namespace for typedefs

[Henry Spencer]

In article <38 at asterix.stanford.edu> kon at asterix.Stanford.EDU (Ronnie Kon) writes:
>	The namespace for typedefs is (IMHO) wrong...
>	What I think should happen is that either typedefs get their own
>namespace (my preferred solution), or typedefs should automatically appear
>within all struct/union member namespaces. ...
>		...Do other people believe that this should be changed?

Why bother?
-- 
"The N in NFS stands for Not, |     Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
or Need, or perhaps Nightmare"| uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry at zoo.toronto.edu