for(;;) vs. while(1) is a draw

Peter da Silva peter at ficc.ferranti.com
Fri Jun 1 05:50:39 AEST 1990


In article <5931 at buengc.BU.EDU> bph at buengc.bu.edu (Blair P. Houghton) indulges
in a bunch of legalistic hairsplitting.

So the question comes down to whether the phrase "the compiler claims
X3.159 conformance" is equivalent to "the implementor claimed to be
matching the standard's model of a hypothetical machine". Since the
standard (X3.159) is defined in terms of this hypothetical machine, this
is such a fine point that only a lawyer would care about the difference...

> Oh, good.  A paying customer.  This is exactly the sort
> of non-comprehension that makes lawyers blithely rich while
> being their usual, stupid selves.

Are you a lawyer?
-- 
`-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180.  <peter at ficc.ferranti.com>
 'U`  Have you hugged your wolf today?  <peter at sugar.hackercorp.com>
@FIN  Dirty words: Zhghnyyl erphefvir vayvar shapgvbaf.



More information about the Comp.std.c mailing list