wchar_t values

Norman Diamond diamond at jit345.swstokyo.dec.com
Thu Apr 11 19:38:36 AEST 1991


In article <78 at titccy.cc.titech.ac.jp> mohta at necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta) writes:

>How can you be codeset independent by having ISO C addendum about 10646?

The same way you can be word-size independent and still specify minimum
values.  Well, almost the same way.  It is still worth standardizing a
translation scheme to be used WHEN the character set is 10646.  (It would
also be worth standardizing a translation scheme to be used when the
character set is the invariant subset of 646.)
--
Norman Diamond       diamond at tkov50.enet.dec.com
If this were the company's opinion, I wouldn't be allowed to post it.



More information about the Comp.std.c mailing list