Interaction between storage class and qualifiers

Doug Gwyn gwyn at smoke.brl.mil
Wed Jan 9 20:34:25 AEST 1991


In article <1991Jan8.011724.25209 at jituha.enet.dec.com> diamond at tkov50.enet.dec.com (Norman Diamond) writes:
>OK, let's pretend that section 3.5 says "identifier" (fixed up somehow)
>instead of "declarator".

No, there is nothing wrong with the wording of 3.5 that I can see.
SGI apparently simply got the implementation wrong; there are numerous
problems in their ANSI C support as of Irix release 3.3.  We'll see if
it is fixed in their forthcoming new C implementation.



More information about the Comp.std.c mailing list