UIDs and GIDs

[Sean Fagan]

From: seanf at sco.COM (Sean Fagan)

In article <743 at longway.TIC.COM> mbrown at osf.org (Mark Brown) writes:
>In 1003.1, "User ID" is defined as a positive integer (so is GID)...
>Also, uid_t is defined as an arithmetic type (same for gid_t).
>How does one handle (or can one handle) certain networking conventions that
>use a "dummy" user ("nobody") and require a user id of -2 ?
>Do these conflict as they seem, or am I missing something (always possible..)

Certain networking conventions are broken.

uid_t and gid_t have usually (always?) been considered unsigned shorts.
Most architectures let them get away with it, barely.  It is not a good
idea, though.

---
-----------------+
Sean Eric Fagan  | "Just think, IBM and DEC in the same room, 
seanf at sco.COM    |      and we did it."
uunet!sco!seanf  |         -- Ken Thompson, quoted by Dennis Ritchie
(408) 458-1422   | Any opinions expressed are my own, not my employers'.

Volume-Number: Volume 20, Number 64