unix-pc rmgroup due next week
John Opalko, N7KBT
jgo at mcgp1.UUCP
Tue May 21 05:00:51 AEST 1991
In article <1991May16.053820.26650 at chance.UUCP> john at chance.UUCP (John R. MacMillan) writes:
|>It is counterproductive to the goals and intents of the users of these
|>groups that you, Mr. Becker, unilateraly decide (for no apparently good
|>reason, by your admission) to throw a spanner in the work. RMGROUP THEM
|I hate to sound like a shit-disturber, but don't forget, in spite of
|voting guidelines and all that, Usenet is essentially an anarchy, and
|if Bruce doesn't want to honour the rmgroup, well, so what? That's
|his prerogative as a sysadmin, and it doesn't ``throw a spanner in the
|works'', unless a lot of people feel like he does, in which case the
|group might as well be kept around for those people.
Mr. Becker is free to keep whatever groups he wishes on his machine. I just
hope he doesn't reply to every rmgroup message with a newgroup, as he is
(in)famous for doing in the alt hierarchy.
The rmgroup will be honored, and the groups aliased, here and on n7kbt.
jgo at mcgp1.uucp (work)
john at n7kbt.wa.com (home)
More information about the Comp.sys.3b1