"comp.sys.3b2" and "comp.sources.3b2" anyone?

[Paul S. Sawyer]

In article <20590 at netsys.NETSYS.COM> len at netsys.NETSYS.COM (Len Rose) writes:
>
> Creating comp.sys.3b2 is fine as long as there enough traffic. We tried to
> create it before and we weren't able to generate enough interest. Look
> at the statistics for the u3b subnet.. 

Just don't forget those of us who run "dinosaurs" like the 3B5, 3B15, 3B4000,
3B20S (3B20D?).  As ATT has already orphaned them, and is now busy courting
its newly adopted (kidnapped?) family, net support is more important than ever!
(comp.sys.3b2-and-up?  naah...  B-)

> Just an opinion (I shouldn't even be posting,since I am officially gagged)

Glad to hear from you.  I wish you the best, under the circumstances.
-- 
Paul S. Sawyer             {uunet,attmail}!unhtel!paul    paul at unhtel.unh.edu
UNH CIS - - Telecommunications and Network Services      VOX: +1 603 862 3262
Durham, New Hampshire  03824-3523                        FAX: +1 603 862 2030