Color SPARCstation 1+ fast enough without GX?
Larry Wake
lwake at awesun.west.sun.com
Thu Jun 14 04:46:47 AEST 1990
In article <8813 at brazos.Rice.edu> sunquest!whm at uunet.uu.net (Bill Mitchell) writes:
>
>So, the question: Is a color GX-less 4/65 a good idea or a bad idea? Do
>you have GX-less 4/60s or 4/65s? What sort of applications do you find
>them to be adequate for? For what are they inadequate? Would you care to
>hazard a comparison versus some other workstation (mono or color)?
Well, I hate to blow someone's sale, but...I have a GX-less 4/60 on my
desk, upon which I'm running OW2.0 beta. Graphics performance is
certainly adequate for anything I do on a day to day basis. I'd recommend
at least 12 Meg of memory if you're doing lots o' color stuff.
I don't know if I'd go so far as to say that Sun's party line is "don't
touch a GX-less system"; my own personal line is "The GX is a great
product; if you can afford it, go for it." A color SS1 is good. A color
SS1 GX sizzles. Mayhaps the rep's enthusiasm for the product caused him
to push the GX harder than you wanted to hear about.
(PS: One thing the GX improves that you might not have considered is text
scrolling performance. Compare cmdtool or xterm windows on GX and GX-less
systems and see if the difference is enough for you to care about.)
Larry Wake, Sun Microsystems (larry.wake at west.sun.com)
More information about the Comp.sys.sun
mailing list