tar or cpio, which is better?
Richard Ducoty
duc at grumbly.COM
Fri Nov 23 01:59:19 AEST 1990
mpreen at hemel.bull.co.uk (Malcolm Preen) writes:
>sparks at power.viewlogic.com (Alan Sparks) writes:
>>In article <1990Nov12.095657.22489 at erbe.se> prc at erbe.se (Robert Claeson) writes:
>>>Using cpio instead worked just fine. Also, for backup purposes,
>>>cpio is probably the best. It comes *standard* with the ability to
>>>detect end-of-tape and create multi-volume archives.
>On our system, Bull DPX/2-300 running a mix of system V and BSD the man page
>for cpio says :
>.........
> -I file
> Read the contents of file as input. If file is a
> ...
> -O file
> Direct the output of cpio to file. If file is a
> ...
=======================================
SVR4 also includes the I,O,.. switches for multi volume cpio. You have
to be careful using these switches if the tapes, files, etc might be
used on System V 3.2 or earlier System V machines.
\\\
- - Richard Ducoty ..uunet!grumbly!duc
_] Capitola, California duc at grumbly.com
More information about the Comp.unix.admin
mailing list