SVVS requires a panic? Was: Re: CRASH your TANDEM :

[Chuck Karish]

In article <6685 at auspex.auspex.com> guy at auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris) writes:
>AT&T has
>done some bogus things in the SVVS [ ... ] , but
>requiring that the system *panic* wasn't one of them, at least not in
>the version of the SVVS I've seen.

It sounded sort of odd to me at the time.  Perhaps I misunderstood.

The actual capabilities of Tandem's systems also sounded wildly
improbable to one who's used to less-robust implementations.

	Chuck Karish		karish at mindcraft.com
	Mindcraft, Inc.		(415) 323-9000