Reliability Exabyte tapes
Brian Colfer
brianc at labmed.ucsf.edu
Wed Mar 6 10:36:41 AEST 1991
In article <1991Feb27.191216.5859 at sobeco.com> sdesmara at sobeco.com (s.desmarais) writes:
>>In article <1781 at svin02.info.win.tue.nl>, hansb at svin02.info.win.tue.nl (Hans Bouw) writes:
>> ...
#>> The consensus was that the most reliable tapes were Exabyte's and
#>> SONY P6-120MPs. Re the latter, there was a consensus that 1 out of
#>> apx. every 40-50 cartridges or so were found to be defective. Our
#>> relatively short-term experience (apx. 7 months) has con- firmed this.
>Is there any comparative study that was done on the reliability of the
>different media available (the ol' 9-track, exabytes, streamers,
>worm disks/laser disks, etc). If so, could you point me to one?
Especially DAT... sinice this is the most comparable subsystem to the
Exabyte...
--
Brian Colfer | UC San Francisco |------------------------|
| Dept. of Lab. Medicine | System Administrator, |
brianc at labmed.ucsf.edu | S.F. CA, 94143-0134 USA | Programer/Analyst |
BRIANC at UCSFCCA.BITNET | PH. (415) 476-2325 |------------------------|
More information about the Comp.unix.admin
mailing list