setuid (was Re: Non Destructive Version of rm)

j chapman flack chap at art-sy.detroit.mi.us
Mon May 13 22:57:51 AEST 1991


In article <JIK.91May6001507 at pit-manager.mit.edu>,
jik at athena.mit.edu (Jonathan I. Kamens) writes:
>
>                                 both because setuid programs are a
>   bad idea in general, 

Could someone elaborate?
-- 
Chap Flack                         Their tanks will rust.  Our songs will last.
chap at art-sy.detroit.mi.us                                    -MIKHS 0EODWPAKHS

Nothing I say represents Appropriate Roles for Technology unless I say it does.



More information about the Comp.unix.admin mailing list