replacing sendmail

[Randolph Langley]

   >I'm assuming that you are using smail 3.1 (which is probably
   >a baseless assumption). Anyhow I've had smail 3.1 running as sendmail
   >on my system for some time. 

   >The only catch on an upgrade is to have it stored somewhere
   >else so that when there upgrade walks on the sendmail binary that
   >you have a binary to drop back in.

   >Geoff Coleman
   >Unexsys Systems

Yep, using smail 3.1.19. Were you able to get startsrc/stopsrc
to work with it?

rdl