second thoughts on buying a 3000UX
Scott Evernden
scotte at applix.com
Mon Mar 4 14:07:19 AEST 1991
In article <5PR9W6D at xds13.ferranti.com> peter at ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>In article <1135 at applix.com> scotte at applix.UUCP (Scott Evernden) writes:
>> In the end, I decided to brew myself a 486/33 box.
>
>Are you sure you got the better box? It's got more CPU than a 3000/25,
Yes. Absolutely. I spent a very long time making this decision.
>but unless the video RAM is on the motherboard and not going through the
>slow slow slow IBM-PC bus the overall system is likely to be slower for
>X work. Have you compared the X speed of the two boxes?
I dunno. 8 plane windows move around fast enough. How quickly can
the 3000 blitter process 8 plane images? :-)
>If anything, X is the big reason to go with the 3000 rather than a [34]86
>box.
If I spent all day just running X programs then the A3000 might make more
sense. But, I spend all day compiling code. I need max. disk and cpu
speed. 90% of the time graphics thruput contributes zip to my productivity.
The rest of the time, I'm maybe moving windows, which the 486 can do faster
on a 12MHz bus than the Amiga blitter on it's slow slow slow 7.14 MHz bus.
-scott
More information about the Comp.unix.amiga
mailing list