A/UX Release 2.0

[Rick Auricchio]

In article <1990Mar20.181959.16435 at smurf.sub.org> urlichs at smurf.sub.org (Matthias Urlichs) writes:
>Why not SVR4?
	Since we've been working on this for over a year, it would've
	been tough to find a V.4 tape, yes?
>
>Does the A/UX kernel finally support the Berkeley FFS, and/or the
>#!/usr/bin/whatever convention? Or ar these still the "almost" in the above
>"almost anything"?
    Yes, and yes.
>
>Oh yes, I'd also like to have TIOCCONS instead of /dev/osm, please.
    Oh, well.  Not yet.
>(Ever had "tail -f /dev/osm" cause a kernel bus error?)
    No.

>Is there a decent Mac-like text editor? Or the functional equivalent to the
>MPW Shell? (Long list of superb MPW shell features, sadly missing from Unix,
>omitted.)
	Yes, adapted from MPW.  Called "textedit".

>But can you run the Sun binaries on A/UX, and/or vice versa?
>(The answer is a very obvious "no", right?)
	You're right there.  But you already know that wasn't a *real*
	question, right?  Not much binary compatibility among systems.

>product. It is (good, I mean), but it could be better. What couldn't?
	True.  I expect to be working for a long time perfecting it.
	The more we add, the more we understand needs a bit of polish
	here and there.  But 2.0 has to ship, so many of us reluctantly
	have to forego a bit of polish in favor of getting it to everyone.
-- 
-- 
Rick Auricchio, Apple Computer Inc, 20525 Mariani Av MS 58A Cupertino CA 95014
sun!apple!rick   OR   rick at apple.COM     Mooney N894AR     (408) 974-4227
		Never eat prunes when you're famished.
My opinion is my own. My employer? They use a windsock and a fire extinguisher.