More 6.0.7

Kent Sandvik ksand at Apple.COM
Fri Mar 29 12:55:01 AEST 1991


In article <4658 at dftsrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> jim at jagubox.gsfc.nasa.gov (Jim Jagielski) writes:
>I've heard/read from quite a number of different sources that 6.0.7 should
>NOT be used unless you happen to have a Classic, IIsi or IIlc.

>Supposedly, this advice is straight from Apple themselves.

>First of all: Is it true?

I don't think that the official or inoffical policy is to tell people
to stay away from System 6.0.7. Don't trust those who say that. 
Anyway, most of us at DTS are running System 7b5-b6 just now :-).

>Second: Does this mean that 6.0.7 under 2.0.1 will be flaky?

If you find problems, report them to REPORTS.AUX at applelink.apple.com.

Kent 
...isn't it fun when you switch to another C++ compiler, and you get
new fresh error messages...
-- 
Disclaimer: *Private* activity on the Net, in no way connected to any company.
Any sexually or racially sounding statements in the text are not intentional.
Please send email about grammar or spelling errors to ksand at apple.com
This .signature starts to resemble a legal contract...



More information about the Comp.unix.aux mailing list