SCO UNIX Development
Jon Zeeff
zeeff at b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us
Mon Nov 20 12:02:22 AEST 1989
>>> If this is a common problem Xenix may be with us. I was planning to
>>>upgrade in January, but any less performance would be unacceptable. Do
>>>other people find that news bogs the machine?
>>
>>Not any more. Get C News + the various speedups and NICE changes I've done
>>and you don't even notice when news is running.
>
>Sorry, you missed the point here. I wrote the article about there
>being a problem on SCO UNIX when news was running. The point was not
>that news was a problem undex UNIX, the point was that anything that
>is extremely disk intensive causes a problem. You only solve a small
>part of the problem by making news more efficient. What happens when
Oh, so disk i/o is your problem. Then a better version of news will
help to some extent since it copies things around less. If you can't
improve your system (with, for example, a new disk or controller) then
the best thing I've found is to put in some sleep(1) calls. You can
spread i/o to the point where it's a just a blip here and there vs a
steady work stopping burst.
--
Jon Zeeff <zeeff at b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us>
Branch Technology <zeeff at b-tech.mi.org>
It's 1989. Does your software support the ISO 8859 character sets?
More information about the Comp.unix.i386
mailing list