Tape backup performance on 386 ISA/EISA systems

Conor P. Cahill cpcahil at virtech.uucp
Sat Jun 2 15:55:24 AEST 1990

In article <7596 at tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM> keithe at tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Keith Ericson) writes:
>In article <1990May25.123302.26061 at virtech.uucp> cpcahil at virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill) writes:
><	/bin/time sh -c "find . -print | cpio -oBcC 10240 > /dev/rmt0"
>Doesn't cpio bitch about the inclusion of both the "B" and "C 10240" command
>tail?  They're redundant/competing flags to cpio...  ("B" == "C 512").

No. it doesn't bitch.  However it is redundant.  I just can't type in "cpio -o"
without the inclusion of 'B' and 'c'.

Conor P. Cahill            (703)430-9247        Virtual Technologies, Inc.,
uunet!virtech!cpcahil                           46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160
                                                Sterling, VA 22170 

More information about the Comp.unix.i386 mailing list