TCP/IP on ISC and SCO UNIX V.3

[Peter Frenning]

In article <1230 at dialogic.UUCP> paul at dialogic.uucp (The Imaginative Moron aka Joey Pheromone) writes:
 >Can anyone elicidate the differences (if any) between ISC 386/ix
 >Host-Based TCP/IP and SCO UNIX V.3 TCP/IP ?
 >
 >I wish to use an RCP compiler tool from Netwise on a 386/ix system.
 >This compiler produces code for client/server stubs based on a
 >description of alibrary. The produced code uses Netwise's own network
 >library, which in turn, uses the native OS TCP/IP socket library.
 >
 >Currently, Netwise offer the product on SCO UNIX V.3. I am wondering
 >what work would be involved to get the generated code to run on ISC
 >UNIX. Since the CPU architecture is the same, and the only
 >incompatibility I can see is in syntax and semantics of the socket
 >libraries on the two OS's.
 >
 >Can anyone highlight the differences for me ? Even simple information
 >like "ISC is Wollongong, SCO's is XXXX" would be helpful.
 >
 >
 >Paul.
 >--
 >Paul Bennett	      |  			| "I give in, to sin, because
 >Dialogic Corp.	      |   paul at dialogic.UUCP	|  You have to make this life
 >300 Littleton Road    | ..!uunet!dialogic!paul	|  livable"
 >Parsippany, NJ 07054  |	 			|  Martin Gore

ISC uses, or least did so prior to 2.2, their own home-grown TCP/IP, whereas
SCO uses Lachman (the basis for what's now in V.4 as well). The irony of it is
that ISC now owns Lachman and has done so for about a year. IMHO Lachman is
vastly superior to what ISC has(had?).

I guess that's what merger mania creates, strange bedfellows :-)  :-)

+-------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+
|Peter Frenning, Altos Computer Systems, San Jose |   ***** TANSTAAFL *****   |
|2641 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, CA 95134         | There Ain't No Such Thing |
|pfrennin at Altos.COM (..!uunet|sun!altos!pfrennin) | As A Free Lunch (Heinlein)|
+-------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+