c.u.wizards vs. c.u.internals

[Stuart Lynne]

In article <BZS.90Sep6153550 at world.std.com> bzs at world.std.com (Barry Shein) writes:
>
}Why was it important at all to remove c.u.w? Why not just create some
}magnet groups so wizards can have some peace to speak about relatively
}wizardly matters? Was it to make sure that wizards had nowhere else to

Is it time for alt.unix.wizards?

Personally I thought it was a shame to rename wizards. Sort or like renaming
the main street in your town. You loose some of your heritage. Things don't
always have to be perfect (in this case a perfectly concise and rational
naming scheme for comp.unix). Sometimes its ok keep things around just so we
know where we've been. 

-- 
Stuart.Lynne at wimsey.bc.ca ubc-cs!van-bc!sl 604-937-7532(voice)