Microport V/AT Printer Spooler non-Problem

Der Tynan dtynan at sultra.UUCP
Tue Dec 6 09:31:50 AEST 1988


In article <1559 at ssc.UUCP>, fyl at ssc.UUCP (Phil Hughes) writes:
> 
> About 1 hour later they called back.  Things had stopped working.  An
> lpstat showed the old "printer spooler bug" - idle printer but files in
> the queue.  This is only one data point but it sounds to me like there is
> a difference between Centronics and Centronics compatible.
>
> Phil Hughes, SSC, Inc. P.O. Box 55549, Seattle, WA 98155  (206)FOR-UNIX

One thing I would check for, is the printer buffering.  A "Centronics"
interface is just that.  An interface.  A lot of older printers don't have
any kind of buffering, which means that you have to feed it data at the
print rate.  This can result in an interrupt-per-character type arrangement,
which can kill even the best operating system :-(  On newer printers, once
you get the interrupt, you can handshake in a lot of chars at once, meaning
that the latency is a lot less.  It seems to me, that the driver/printer
interface is getting confused.  This could be a result of heavy interaction.
Note however, that I don't use Microport UN*X, so the above is nothing more
than idle speculation, given the information posted.  Hope it helps...
						- Der
-- 
	dtynan at zorba.Tynan.COM  (Dermot Tynan @ Tynan Computers)
	{apple,mips,pyramid,uunet}!Tynan.COM!dtynan

 ---  If the Law is for the People, then why do we need Lawyers? ---



More information about the Comp.unix.microport mailing list