Historical fact ?

Doug Gwyn gwyn at brl-smoke.ARPA
Thu May 19 00:57:04 AEST 1988


In article <376 at axis.fr> loic at axis.fr (Loic Dachary) writes:
>   I really wonder why root inode is 2. In the old ages it was 1 (CACM 74).
>When did it change ?

I seem to recall that it changed between 6th and 7th Edition,
i.e. around 1977.  I think inode 1 was reserved for chaining
bad blocks onto, but I don't recall that being implemented.



More information about the Comp.unix.questions mailing list