ksh 11/16/88e now available in AT&T Toolchest
Chet Ramey
chet at cwns1.CWRU.EDU
Thu Oct 4 00:08:28 AEST 1990
In article <APS.90Oct3040434 at kaarne.tut.fi> aps at tut.fi (Suntioinen Ari) writes:
>=> 2) The ksh is a miserable piece of junk, when compared to the
>=> GNU superset shell, BASH (which supports ksh-like vi-type
>=> editing, and built-in help, among other things). GNU is free,
>=> with modifiable source; ksh costs money.
>
>BASH is great, it dumps core and has clear documentation.
Well, I guess you're entitled to a full refund.
Korn first released ksh in 1982. Bash has had a year. Give us time to
catch up.
As to documentation, FTP to cwns1.ins.cwru.edu (129.22.8.43) for a very
detailed bash manual page. It's in pub/bash/bash.1. There's also a
Postscript version there in bash.PS. The next release of bash will have
an `FSF-style' texinfo manual. I've proofed it; I know it exists.
The next release of bash should also be much more stable. Brian is in
the process of merging two slightly divergent versions -- his and mine.
I run mine here as sh on several machines (all 4.3 BSD, but then that's
what we've got...), and haven't had a version that wasn't in the middle
of some development cycle dump core in months. I would expect the merged
version to be just as reliable.
(By the way, I don't mind Larry posting ksh announcements here. In fact,
I'd like him to post a list of changes between 88d and 88e, if he would.
I'm always looking for reasonable ksh features to incorporate into bash.)
Chet
--
Chet Ramey ``Levi Stubbs' tears run down
Network Services Group his face...''
Case Western Reserve University
chet at ins.CWRU.Edu
More information about the Comp.unix.shell
mailing list