SCO doesn't sell UNIX

Sean Eric Fagan sef at kithrup.COM
Sat Dec 15 13:19:24 AEST 1990


In article <1990Dec14.035940.28832 at NCoast.ORG> allbery at ncoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery KB8JRR) writes:
>That isn't true, as far as I've been able to learn.  I don't know if it's a
>lie or a misunderstanding on the part of someone at SCO, but it is incorrect.
>
>The POSIX filename truncation vs. error business is *optional* behavior
>intended to allow systems with hard filename length restrictions to still
>support a POSIX source code environment.  It is *not* required, nor even
>desirable (from a POSIX compliance standpoint, that is), as far as I have been
>able to determine.

It *is* required by FIPS, which is a superset of POSIX.  That is the only
reason it's there.

So the misunderstanding is on your part.

-- 
Sean Eric Fagan  | "I made the universe, but please don't blame me for it;
sef at kithrup.COM  |  I had a bellyache at the time."
-----------------+           -- The Turtle (Stephen King, _It_)
Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.



More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386 mailing list