File system performance

Piercarlo Grandi pcg at cs.aber.ac.uk
Sat Nov 3 10:52:11 AEST 1990


On 1 Nov 90 11:47:26 GMT, larry at nstar.uucp (Larry Snyder) said:

larry> rcd at ico.isc.com (Dick Dunn) writes:

rcd> Not too surprisingly, we've looked at that a bit.  One answer stands out
rcd> like a sore thumb:  If you're running V.4, *don't* use the old-style s5
rcd> file system unless you really need it.  The BSD-style file system is a far
rcd> better performer.

larry> Yes - but 8K blocks - just think what that would do to your partition
larry> with all the news articles --

What about fragments? They cure the wasted space problem. Naturally it
would have been better to just do allocations of runs of small blocks,
like the ISC FFS does, but the fragment approach works almost equally
well, excep that it is much more complex.

There is some recent paper in some conference proceedings on how to make
even faster file systems.
--
Piercarlo "Peter" Grandi           | ARPA: pcg%uk.ac.aber.cs at nsfnet-relay.ac.uk
Dept of CS, UCW Aberystwyth        | UUCP: ...!mcsun!ukc!aber-cs!pcg
Penglais, Aberystwyth SY23 3BZ, UK | INET: pcg at cs.aber.ac.uk



More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386 mailing list