Slow RA 90 disks on DECsystem 5XXX
Andreas Karrer
karrer at bernina.ethz.ch
Thu Dec 13 06:43:41 AEST 1990
We have 6 DEC RA 90 disks, three on a DECsystem 5840 (BI bus, KDB50 controller)
and 3 on a DECsystem 5400 (Q-Bus, KDA50 controller).
We are not impressed by their performance. Some comparisons:
Copy a 10 M file between two partitions on different disks
(load average was 0.1 and less in all cases
machine disks real sys
Convex C 220 NEC D2363 VME 2.5 2.1 sec
Sun 4/490 Sabre 1150 IPI 4.9 2.9
Convex C 120 NEC D2363 Multibus 8.2 4.4
* DECsystem 5840 DEC RA 90 KDB ctrlr 29.0 13.4
Sun 3/280 CDC Eagle SMD 33.4 12.9
* DECsystem 5400 DEC RA 90 KDA ctrlr 37.3 10.5
* DEC VAX 11/785 DEC RA 81 41.4 25.1
(Comparison with Convex is probably not fair, these cost a bit more)
In short, disk i/o on DEC machines has hardly improved in the last 5 years.
(comparison with Convex is not really fair, these cost a bit more).
The RA90 are supposed to have a peak transfer rate of 2.8 Mb/sec...
And, these RA90 are NOT CHEAP...
questions:
- Am I doing something wrong here? Yeah I tried upping the bufcache to 25 %,
didn't help any. Please no benchmark flames...
- does a HSC help?
- are there third party disks (faster, cheaper, or both) for the DS 5xxx?
+-----------
Andi Karrer, Communication Systems, ETH Zuerich, Switzerland
karrer at ks.id.ethz.ch
More information about the Comp.unix.ultrix
mailing list