perl on dec 5000, ultrix 4.0: $& and recursive evals fail
Michael Meissner
meissner at osf.org
Tue Jul 31 06:55:00 AEST 1990
In article <5960 at titcce.cc.titech.ac.jp> tmaeno at cc.titech.ac.jp
(Toshinori Maeno) writes:
| In <EMV.90Jul29213617 at urania.math.lsa.umich.edu> emv at math.lsa.umich.edu (Edward Vielmetti) writes:
|
| >In article <THEWALT.90Jul29124249 at canuck.ce.berkeley.edu> thewalt at canuck.ce.berkeley.edu (C. Thewalt) writes:
|
| > Ed said: perl on dec 5000, ultrix 4.0.
| > fails tests 40-42 in op.s, all having to do with $&.
| > fails tests 8 and 9 in op.eval, dealing with recursive evals.
|
| > Chris said: I compiled everything without -O and all tests pass.
|
| > Ed said: thanks Chris and Michael Stryker (strkyer at phyc.ucsf.edu),
| > compiling with -g (not -O) and -DCRIPPLED_CC and it passes all
| > tests.
| We had the same problem on our MIPS3240 and Sony RISC NEWS.
| Mr. Ohta found that Mips C compiler generates buggy code for perly.c
| when we compiled with -O.
| Maeno Toshinori
If you saved the recent GNU CC patches that I sent to the gnu CC bug
list, the compiler produced will compile perl with normal and -O2
optimizations. Note that the patches I submitted do not allow for
full debugging, since RMS requested that I delay the debug patches
until GCC revision 2.00.
--
Michael Meissner email: meissner at osf.org phone: 617-621-8861
Open Software Foundation, 11 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA
Do apple growers tell their kids money doesn't grow on bushes?
More information about the Comp.unix.ultrix
mailing list