ls follies

Rick Peralta fbp at cybvax0.UUCP
Thu Aug 22 01:40:55 AEST 1985


In article <321 at luke.UUCP> you write:
>>  What gets me is there is no way to convince ls to produce _unsorted_ 
>>output!  (never mind why...
>

How about ls -f.

By the way why does -f have to turn off -l and about everything else ?
Please followup in net.unix.


Rick  ...!cybvax0[!dmc0]!fbp

"A likely story.  I don't believe a word of it."



More information about the Comp.unix.wizards mailing list