death of nargs(3)

Doug Gwyn gwyn at brl-smoke.ARPA
Thu Apr 28 01:39:26 AEST 1988


It is perhaps also worth pointing out that nargs() didn't really return
the number of arguments, just the number of words on the stack used for
arguments.  As C grew, this became less sensible.

I can easily enough imagine a reasonable implementation of C for which
requiring that something like nargs() work would force a slower function
call interface, which would be a poor trade-off.



More information about the Comp.unix.wizards mailing list