Should ``csh'' be part of the System V distribution?

[Eduardo Krell]

In article <770 at yabbie.rmit.oz> rcodi at yabbie.UUCP writes:

>The rest would have just used whatever was going and was advised to
>them by somebody else, who may or may not have evaluated both shells
>either.

Not so. Everyone in my department, for example, came from a BSD environment
(in Universities) where csh was the only shell they ever used (myself
included). They've never heard of ksh and they've never used the bourne
shell either. All of them eventually switched over to ksh and have never
gone back to csh.
    
    Eduardo Krell                   AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ

    UUCP: {ihnp4,ucbvax}!ulysses!ekrell		ARPA: ekrell at ulysses.att.com